]]>
My question is, how close to neutrally buoyant is it? If it could be 100% neutrally buoyant then prints could be made with no supports whatsoever! Right? The only drawback would be that drain holes would need to be added for closed shells to get the water out. Also, capillary action would tend to retain the water in tiny recesses and the inner surfaces of walls would retain moisture as well, so some kind of special drying operation would need to be implemented.
UGG! I won't be able to participate fully in experimentation with any kind of SLA until at least February some time.
Statistics: Posted by James — Tue Dec 17, 2013 6:47 am
]]>
http://utwired.engr.utexas.edu/lff/symp ... 6-Zhou.pdf
Statistics: Posted by AndersonTa — Sun Dec 15, 2013 11:20 pm
]]>
Statistics: Posted by PacManFan — Thu Dec 12, 2013 10:44 pm
]]>
another photo of the waves:
If you print very small parts, that waves, is not noticeable.
Another main important thing about VAT tilt versus VAT Slide(b9creator):
SURELY doesnt work well with all resins, let me explain... if you have a hollow piece of 15 cm tall who wants to print in ELASTIC resin, probably you have a lot of problems, because the elastic compound was probably wasted with slide VAT movements and the elastic behaviour of the resin.For that reason my 3Dprinter configuration is with VAT tilt, because is more accurate(movement of unsticking is in z, like the build) and I can use different kinds of Shores.
about the time that spends for one layer my machine, depends of the steppers, the velocity steppers, and distance lift that you configure for unstick every layer.(and of course, the resin, and UV light of projector)
Statistics: Posted by octanees — Thu Dec 12, 2013 7:00 pm
]]>
]]>
And they quantify the force needed to release using Sylgard for all those interested.
Thoughts?
http://www-bcf.usc.edu/~yongchen/Resear ... 2_7232.pdf
Statistics: Posted by AndersonTa — Thu Dec 12, 2013 5:01 pm
]]>